human values are created by social system, war, crime, politic & poverty are essentially money related so those who contribute are not getting paid, why they would do it? their reward is the fruit of society as a whole, they contribute because it is at their best interest to do so. just as everyone can contribute. self-interest become integrated as social interest, they become 1. you want to help yourself, you must help society explicitly. everything is for the greater good. frankly i believe our survival as a species is absolutely contingent upon this world view.
moreover, the participants and contributor would not be fixed, they are constantly evolving based on who wants to participate, who can contribute in any given feel. abstractly speaking this actually would be a true democracy, wouldn't it? arbitrary voting for politician is now replaced by a logical review of given concepts based on social merit with the contributor brought in help, not "im gonna reduce taxes".... and.. "here comes change"...
the degree which a person can contribute is based on their education level, ability to create and problem solving. this is why extended education is critical. in today's society you'll find the public is essentially kept distracted and uninformed, this is how the government maintain control. if you review history, you'll find that power is maintained by ignorance. in non-monetary system, the goal of the education system is to produce the most intelligent, aware human being as possible. why? because everyone then becomes contributor, greatly affecting our collective social evolution for the better and improving the life of all.
intelligence will no longer be a threat to the establishment, for there is no power establishment. there will be no budget restriction or unethical agenda to deter progress also people would have high propensity to become generalist, not specialist. specialization is a limitation, the monetary system promote specialization as a form of labor distribution for income, its kinda built in and its a colossal hindrance. i believe buckminister fuller put it quite well on this issue :
"our failures are a consequence of many factors, but possibly one of the most important is the fact that society operates on the theory that specialization is the key to success, not realizing that specialization precludes comprehensive thinking. this means that the potentially - integrable - techno - economic advantages are not comprehended integratively and therefore are not realized.."
in another words people need to be broadly educated, not refined and isolated. this leads to detached thinking, so who suppose to makes the decision in our society? no one does. decisions are arrived at by the use of the scientific method. actually by asking such question as "who makes the decision" is devious logic, its not who makes the decision, but by what method decisions arrived at :
Scientific Method - the basic steps in the scientific method are :
State the problem
Gather information
Form a hypothesis
Test the hypothesis
Record and analyze data
State the conclusion
Repeat the work
the question of who makes the decision is a bias attribute that we are trapped-in because of our rationally founded fear of each other groups. which we are continually to pursue power based on monetary gain. using a monetary systems as their tools to continue to maintain control.
